From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32415 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2003 10:18:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32408 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2003 10:18:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Dec 2003 10:18:46 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.158.217]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.8-GR) with ESMTP id CBH55445; Sat, 13 Dec 2003 12:18:01 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 10:18:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) Message-Id: <7105-Sat13Dec2003121639+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: kevinb@redhat.com, drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20031212194929.71F004B412@berman.michael-chastain.com> (mec.gnu@mindspring.com) Subject: Re: [commit] Deprecate remaining STREQ uses Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20031212194929.71F004B412@berman.michael-chastain.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00353.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 14:49:29 -0500 (EST) > From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) > > But basically, I think we should be more aggressive about > deprecating things. If nobody submits test results for a platform > to the gdb-testers group for a long time, then I would like to drop > that platform. I disagree. I think deprecating platforms should be done very cautiously, definitely not as the default reaction to no patches being submitted. If you are proposing a change in the current strategy, this issue should be discussed (on gdb@, I guess). For startesr, please define the ``long time'' after which it is okay, in your opinion, to deprecate a platform.