From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25705 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2004 15:33:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25684 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2004 15:33:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2004 15:33:09 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.158.204]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.5-GR) with ESMTP id CPS93798; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:32:25 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:33:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Andrew Cagney Message-Id: <7105-Fri19Mar2004172948+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: drow@false.org, mec.gnu@mindspring.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <405B0BC3.70807@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:03:31 -0500) Subject: Re: [rfa/doco] PROBLEMS: add regressions since gdb 6.0 Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20040318162402.A32E34B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> <4059FC60.2090605@gnu.org> <20040319002701.GB25876@nevyn.them.org> <405B0BC3.70807@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00453.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:03:31 -0500 > From: Andrew Cagney > > > > What do we gain by removing something that continues to be a major > > problem from the file named PROBLEMS? I just don't get it. > > Please read my most recent reply from yesterday. Andrew, I did read your reply, and I still don't get it; please bear with us. Assuming that we only leave in PROBLEMS those bugs that have visible user-level effect, do you still object to have there bugs from old versions? If so, please tell why you think users should not know about them. TIA