From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 115699 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2018 19:53:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 115673 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jul 2018 19:53:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: sesbmg23.ericsson.net Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (HELO sesbmg23.ericsson.net) (193.180.251.37) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 19:53:55 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=ericsson.com; s=mailgw201801; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@ericsson.com; t=1532980433; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:CC:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=T9HI1IhqLBCl8j0ZNmLsjGvBNxb7RuzcdJcsq+cfC6Y=; b=QQkVymBsOV3xhK8A2C3a9WXZ+YghaTZ0ZX7yAapXnzbYx4rAdXL/cAYt126B4Pxs 0AzI2c38RhvILyguvZQtuW67Lj1dgqEa4GA5tBBj9mMwFdKv5EfNItUPaQ0FjHUw ycogUF2vXvdWbVrunBIwXfuROK4UlMXctGSn9uPQOa8=; Received: from ESESSMB501.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.119]) by sesbmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 53.0E.27833.1DC6F5B5; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 21:53:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ESESSMB502.ericsson.se (153.88.183.163) by ESESSMB501.ericsson.se (153.88.183.162) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1466.3; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 21:53:51 +0200 Received: from NAM04-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (153.88.183.157) by ESESSMB502.ericsson.se (153.88.183.163) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1466.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 21:53:51 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericsson.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=7ddhpsLPv6lYHmrEKyl+cxLn+LnrEkx/TTAnCRmO5Go=; b=bYBpavxvI+lzauFbxCBQxdTuWndTTE7nOyJ2DttDYBfAUkYEBWxj2/gNc28IBSItZAFYGTi7YaJ24Nh214Gkqfwab569adNBXWNTtdNP3LQrJag/saOcCGLDR74wFqhPkGghYMQrHZCgUz5NZmcurenax/YXEQ3I0LwVpmuQl20= Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=simon.marchi@ericsson.com; Received: from [142.133.60.128] (192.75.88.130) by DM6PR15MB2396.namprd15.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:8d::30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.995.21; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 19:53:49 +0000 Subject: Re: [PING] [PATCH v5] Fix segfault when invoking -var-info-path-expression on a dynamic varobj To: Tom Tromey , Jan Vrany CC: gdb-patches References: <20180702192047.18384-1-jan.vrany@fit.cvut.cz> <64280436fa39130ab3f567ce968a40d5f2f5ce62.camel@fit.cvut.cz> <878t5s655q.fsf@tromey.com> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <70f6aa95-d44e-e34b-74fd-341104133db2@ericsson.com> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 19:53:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <878t5s655q.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: simon.marchi@ericsson.com Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: ericsson.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-07/txt/msg00789.txt.bz2 On 2018-07-30 12:48 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Vrany writes: > > Thanks for the patch. > >>> + Copyright (C) 1999-2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > >>> +# Copyright (C) 2008-2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > >>> +# Copyright (C) 2008-2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > These dates look weird. I assume you copied the headers from elsewhere > -- a time-honored tradition. However if the files don't substantially > share anything with other files, I think just 2018 should suffice. > > This is ok with this either fixed, or if there's some overlap, an email > to that effect. > > Tom > Just noting that Jan doesn't have push access, so I can take care of pushing the patch once he answers about the copyright years. Simon