From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id rE0vOiMe+18+dgAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 10:32:51 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id DFDE21EE85; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 10:32:51 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03EB71EE1B for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 10:32:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33AFC3857819; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 15:32:50 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 33AFC3857819 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1610292770; bh=RhoTChh7xxu6Aoi/IozCzd6xt34ckdGSC6W3jQBsiTE=; h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=WZJGFnX5m2Cy4ewBjkW3LaINcQRLqpb1F2Ij1/ydbZ6fo8+yYTfWBqdrUQm5t+oLf GJdIGo3WXBOSSlc91T0YhBwRd43p/9qynJZVfhLMtxCk1hVtWhbdAkGFnHgwVrGa59 1+XPHetUiCFIIcrtIff8YAa5+LyjxgyiI9ztABN4= Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (smtp.polymtl.ca [132.207.4.11]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 992023857819 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 15:32:46 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 992023857819 Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 10AFWLiL018365 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 10 Jan 2021 10:32:26 -0500 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.polymtl.ca 10AFWLiL018365 Received: from [10.0.0.213] (192-222-157-6.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.157.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DAEA1EE1B; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 10:32:21 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Enable GDB build with in-tree GMP and MPFR To: Bernd Edlinger , Joel Brobecker References: <214e9564-5dfd-65a2-c2d8-6e8398ebc913@simark.ca> <87o8iw9ilx.fsf@tromey.com> <20201215023315.GK3461@adacore.com> <4ea7575a-b727-d9b7-e510-5c8b942f77f9@polymtl.ca> <20201216073333.GA934694@adacore.com> <89e6d36b-7a4b-4eed-69bd-fa82add4dab0@polymtl.ca> <1451a5d1-97e4-3c37-030f-f2808249b100@polymtl.ca> Message-ID: <6fd200f3-a3b2-0731-555a-723b03c239a0@polymtl.ca> Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 10:32:20 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Poly-FromMTA: (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) at Sun, 10 Jan 2021 15:32:21 +0000 X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Simon Marchi Cc: Pedro Alves , Tom Tromey , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 2021-01-10 9:12 a.m., Bernd Edlinger wrote: > Hmm, I see, but it was argued previously on this list, that it is okay > for GDB to have a mandatory dependency to GMP because GCC has the same > dependency. > > However GCC offers exactly the same convenience as it allows GMP > to be optionally built in-tree. I don't see how that requires us to do the same thing. Simon