From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 2F4SKv0LZmBxNgAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 14:07:57 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id AA8421EF4F; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 14:07:57 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19C221E783 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 14:07:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2F43857814; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 18:07:56 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CC2F43857814 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1617300476; bh=eB6htilTeW5o8daUi5Y0h78BOIWgRkxMO29m+850n9Q=; h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=mgQqBUh1apV9h/oeNy59DZe15pOQ1k+9HG+voGzXdaSjC1p11hxF0Q+xUmLWeFpLS bkLHPVAKr3LIw5gV3iHhLbmYe1e5cL8N7yZLRHqYMJlOhe2YCd+e+hAhiRgBKTQkZH PXHXnHEzx4b3XG5NZZ2LP9e9YZzgxldsXWyEJ8Ww= Received: from mail-qt1-x834.google.com (mail-qt1-x834.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::834]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4053C3858012 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 18:07:54 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 4053C3858012 Received: by mail-qt1-x834.google.com with SMTP id x9so2097754qto.8 for ; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 11:07:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eB6htilTeW5o8daUi5Y0h78BOIWgRkxMO29m+850n9Q=; b=MAl7upbA66Mc8a9DRj2Ccwiqv5Ih2R7vCn2od6rhm4bvE5PkwDpCU+gh0qQA8xdGtP +CT5EuUCzYEm8yFsux09wKgWHo1yRuiKRd0Vivrk+GLvM1V9MFsCe9wixUKo3fX6eDfQ qYh1H3Nd9GXy+/ykf7415HvEaFZscoo99KHxwr6mUBXM8vYmAFVoNjED1LaLeA7Kw2gn z+3rFxfgdxj+atk4D+0nVYm0/DX6YZgZclsun3gc/JqTZt6Jp5ShLCuC2GQOLvaffwwA QuxTDOUTqPF/q0bjtyH5/UC3Jc5ELMovM5k9JBtN2DC+6G3AnmlRI1PSNRCTi4mXoOlI U5ug== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531mtrOt0Dy6QLqMRLjbkTgPLXr1RQWWqeJJIpWV8bfISVACUI8R M3LIQukmwB9boBfFrWGvRtvh4eg94CUK4A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwSxboJY4T1VgtIjOHgezFE0ChF+PGA7rQEwwQ8wFNPrSX911wPdCf5ZWylxzvHR161LIn7yA== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:6690:: with SMTP id d16mr8319333qtp.312.1617300473812; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 11:07:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2804:7f0:4841:2841:a9:4096:7e03:e64d? ([2804:7f0:4841:2841:a9:4096:7e03:e64d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g186sm4778012qke.0.2021.04.01.11.07.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Apr 2021 11:07:53 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] C++ compile support To: Tom Tromey , Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches References: <20180810232534.481-1-keiths@redhat.com> <20180810232534.481-10-keiths@redhat.com> <87pmzdopai.fsf@tromey.com> Message-ID: <6fbe6290-980c-9714-4fe1-7b9426b945d4@linaro.org> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 15:07:50 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87pmzdopai.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Luis Machado via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Luis Machado Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 4/1/21 3:03 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>> + { >>> + const char *what = TYPE_DECLARED_CLASS (type) ? "struct" : "class"; > > Simon> I don't know if this matters, but the condition above looks reversed, > Simon> can you confirm? > > FWIW, last time I tried, at least one of the c++ compile tests causes a > gcc crash, then lots of timeouts. Are these working for anyone? > > Tom > They "work" with some PASSes, but there are a lot of FAIL's for aarch64-linux/armhf-linux.