From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 123909 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2018 10:24:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 123676 invoked by uid 89); 20 Aug 2018 10:24:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*F:D*cz X-HELO: relay.fit.cvut.cz Received: from relay.fit.cvut.cz (HELO relay.fit.cvut.cz) (147.32.232.237) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 10:24:17 +0000 Received: from imap.fit.cvut.cz (imap.fit.cvut.cz [147.32.232.238]) by relay.fit.cvut.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w7KAO70s049881 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=OK); Mon, 20 Aug 2018 12:24:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jan.vrany@fit.cvut.cz) Received: from sao (5ac693bc.bb.sky.com [90.198.147.188] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0 as user vranyj1) by imap.fit.cvut.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w7KAO35S017419 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 20 Aug 2018 12:24:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jan.vrany@fit.cvut.cz) Message-ID: <6f76113c2dd46ab38c7669ea2157884965699e5f.camel@fit.cvut.cz> Subject: Re: [RFC] mi: print frame architecture when printing frames on an MI channel From: Jan Vrany To: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 10:24:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: References: <27ddbc19-e970-a08b-d684-870dd11846b0@redhat.com> <20180813105257.22348-1-jan.vrany@fit.cvut.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2018-08/txt/msg00459.txt.bz2 Hi, > > > uiout->text ("\n"); > > } > > - > > + > > Spurious change here. > Actually, it is not spurious. The original source contains character <0x0C>. It seems (seemed) to me that it's some sort of edit error so I removed it while editing code around. If you prefer to keep it there or fix this in another commit, let me know. Jan