From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id N9W7M7HfR2PnlQsAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 05:51:45 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id C38B21E112; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 05:51:45 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=vbx79d9X; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15AA51E0CB for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 05:51:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 565313850215 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 09:51:41 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 565313850215 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1665654701; bh=8MqPf7nv/8nKWU1EIdwXNNZ/sv91vrN/hmqD+T1Qw7I=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=vbx79d9XyVU/G7PBjXVdhQYNJbokTfHt7reoi+XFN5G/UCTGdL0G3hR0vLYnkMjna CdWeshIl0U3YOJs0UjR1ybigeqH5kjSKVm4FpVSeUMqlG218hh2zGKeKWsfdDoen+e lcBhKwiySC63hDHiF2LPetYI8M0fpJRKc5BHlY7I= Received: from mail-sender-0.a4lg.com (mail-sender-0.a4lg.com [IPv6:2401:2500:203:30b:4000:6bfe:4757:0]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A016F3857BB5; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 09:50:15 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org A016F3857BB5 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail-sender-0.a4lg.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F68E300089; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 09:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <6e4defd8-b02b-9084-afe6-ba22fe75e3d7@irq.a4lg.com> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 18:50:11 +0900 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] sim: Check known getopt definition existence Content-Language: en-US To: Tom de Vries References: <7b235ccb-ab2e-cba0-3015-2eae5fe6a8a4@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <7b235ccb-ab2e-cba0-3015-2eae5fe6a8a4@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Tsukasa OI via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Tsukasa OI Cc: Nick Clifton , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Binutils Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 2022/10/13 1:28, Tom de Vries wrote: > On 10/6/22 08:43, Tsukasa OI via Gdb-patches wrote: >> Clang generates a warning if there is a function declaration/definition >> with zero arguments.  Such declarations/definitions without a >> prototype (an >> argument list) are deprecated forms of indefinite arguments >> ("-Wdeprecated-non-prototype").  On the default configuration, it >> causes a >> build failure (unless "--disable-werror" is specified). >> >> include/getopt.h defines some getopt function definitions but one of them >> has a form "extern int getopt ();".  If this form is selected in >> include/getopt.h, Clang generates a warning and the build fails by >> default. >> >> In really old environments, this getopt definition with no arguments is >> necessary (because the definition may change between environments). >> However, this definition is now a cause of problems on modern >> environments. >> >> A good news is, this definition is not always selected (e.g. if used by >> binutils/*.c).  This is because configuration scripts of binutils, gas, >> gprof and ld tries to find known definition of getopt function is used >> and >> defines HAVE_DECL_GETOPT macro.  If this macro is defined when >> getopt.h is >> included, a good form of getopt is used and Clang won't generate >> warnings. >> >> This commit adds a modified portion of ld/configure.ac to find the known >> getopt definition.  If we could find one (and we *will* in most modern >> environments), we don't need to rely on the deprecated definition. > > I'm guessing this cause the build breakage on buildbot gdb-centos-x86_64 . > > https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/71/builds/1392 > > Thanks, > - Tom Hi Tom, I finally found a cause. First of all, this is reproduced with following configurations (examples are selected to minimize time to reproduce): - CentOS 7 (x86_64; with GNU libc 2.17) - "make all-sim" with following configurations (for example): - --target=m32c-unknown-elf - --target=rl78-unknown-elf And it was true that my commit (as you pointed out) was the initial bad commit but the real cause was much complex than I expected. The reason I could not initially reproduce the issue was because it required GNU libc <= 2.25 to reproduce. An interesting fact is... standard unistd.h on GNU libc <= 2.25 includes (with __need_getopt macro defined) but it actually includes $(srcdir)/include/getopt.h, not getopt.h in GNU libc. Since my change defined HAVE_DECL_GETOPT to 1 on GNU libc-based environment and declaration of the getopt function is suppressed, causing an error. On GNU libc >= 2.26, unistd.h includes without defining __need_getopt and that's why this error is suppressed on newer GNU libc-based environments. Possible reason why this bug is missed is, there are not so many getopt callers (many calls getopt_long or getopt_long_only, not getopt). True getopt callers on Binutils/GDB/GCC are following: - M32C simulator (affected by my change) - RL78 simulator (affected by my change) - gprofng (getopt declaration not checked by gprofng/configure) ... yes, GCC (entirely) and the most of Binutils components do not depend on getopt function anymore. This fact explains why this bug is not discovered so long. The true fix to this is going to be applied to include/getopt.h (Binutils) to detect this include path on GNU libc <= 2.25. Aside from this, some sim source files need to be changed (to minimize problems even further). I'll submit these patchsets soon. Thanks, Tsukasa > > >> --- >>   sim/config.h.in  |  3 +++ >>   sim/configure    | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>   sim/configure.ac | 10 ++++++++++ >>   3 files changed, 45 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/sim/config.h.in b/sim/config.h.in >> index 84c363c0aec..9a94b289e46 100644 >> --- a/sim/config.h.in >> +++ b/sim/config.h.in >> @@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ >>   /* Define to 1 if you have the `chmod' function. */ >>   #undef HAVE_CHMOD >>   +/* Is the prototype for getopt in in the expected >> format? */ >> +#undef HAVE_DECL_GETOPT >> + >>   /* Define to 1 if you have the declaration of `tzname', and to 0 if >> you don't. >>      */ >>   #undef HAVE_DECL_TZNAME >> diff --git a/sim/configure b/sim/configure >> index 75d1935df38..dac7f085be1 100755 >> --- a/sim/configure >> +++ b/sim/configure >> @@ -16428,6 +16428,38 @@ $as_echo "${WARN_CFLAGS} ${WERROR_CFLAGS}" >> >&6; } >>   fi >>     +{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking for a known >> getopt prototype in unistd.h" >&5 >> +$as_echo_n "checking for a known getopt prototype in unistd.h... " >> >&6; } >> +if ${sim_cv_decl_getopt_unistd_h+:} false; then : >> +  $as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6 >> +else >> +  cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext >> +/* end confdefs.h.  */ >> +#include >> +int >> +main () >> +{ >> +extern int getopt (int, char *const*, const char *); >> +  ; >> +  return 0; >> +} >> +_ACEOF >> +if ac_fn_c_try_compile "$LINENO"; then : >> +  sim_cv_decl_getopt_unistd_h=yes >> +else >> +  sim_cv_decl_getopt_unistd_h=no >> +fi >> +rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext >> +fi >> + >> +{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: >> $sim_cv_decl_getopt_unistd_h" >&5 >> +$as_echo "$sim_cv_decl_getopt_unistd_h" >&6; } >> +if test $sim_cv_decl_getopt_unistd_h = yes; then >> + >> +$as_echo "#define HAVE_DECL_GETOPT 1" >>confdefs.h >> + >> +fi >> + >>       diff --git a/sim/configure.ac b/sim/configure.ac >> index 66a1020efe0..be0cfdbea32 100644 >> --- a/sim/configure.ac >> +++ b/sim/configure.ac >> @@ -177,6 +177,16 @@ SIM_AC_OPTION_STDIO >>   SIM_AC_OPTION_TRACE >>   SIM_AC_OPTION_WARNINGS >>   +AC_MSG_CHECKING(for a known getopt prototype in unistd.h) >> +AC_CACHE_VAL(sim_cv_decl_getopt_unistd_h, >> +[AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([#include ], [extern >> int getopt (int, char *const*, const char *);])], >> +sim_cv_decl_getopt_unistd_h=yes, sim_cv_decl_getopt_unistd_h=no)]) >> +AC_MSG_RESULT($sim_cv_decl_getopt_unistd_h) >> +if test $sim_cv_decl_getopt_unistd_h = yes; then >> +  AC_DEFINE([HAVE_DECL_GETOPT], 1, >> +        [Is the prototype for getopt in in the expected >> format?]) >> +fi >> + >>   dnl These are unfortunate.  They are conditionally called by other >> sim macros >>   dnl but always used by common/Make-common.in.  So we have to subst >> here even >>   dnl when the rest of the code is in the respective macros.  Once we >> merge the >