From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-71029-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 29040 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2010 19:47:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 29021 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Mar 2010 19:47:45 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-ww0-f41.google.com) (74.125.82.41)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:47:41 +0000
Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15so1199033wwe.0         for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:47:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.86.82 with SMTP id v60mr1070407wee.180.1268423259352; Fri,  	12 Mar 2010 11:47:39 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <83aaud2wvd.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20100301170152.GA20106@intel.com> 	 <20100312162949.GA22104@caradoc.them.org> <83d3z92ysk.fsf@gnu.org> 	 <201003121820.10722.pedro@codesourcery.com> <83aaud2wvd.fsf@gnu.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:47:00 -0000
Message-ID: <6dc9ffc81003121147x6bd290ccsbdc352e581160128@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Support x86 pseudo registers
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,  	dan@codesourcery.com, msnyder@vmware.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00474.txt.bz2

On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
>> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:20:10 +0000
>> Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>, =A0hjl.tools@gmail.com, =
=A0msnyder@vmware.com
>>
>> We could also stick to defaulting to the architecture meaning, and
>> always provide $_pc, $_sp, $_fp, $_ps registers that always map to
>> the generic versions. =A0That way, when there's a conflict,
>> there's always an escape route.
>
> I think it's a good idea.
>

Do we have a consensus on this? Do I need to do anything for x86?

--=20
H.J.