From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8848 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2010 21:06:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 8833 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Mar 2010 21:06:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.154) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 21:06:22 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so121943fga.12 for ; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 13:06:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.87.73.15 with SMTP id a15mr880257fgl.50.1267563980214; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 13:06:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83y6ia30nc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20100301170152.GA20106@intel.com> <20100302135502.GB16596@caradoc.them.org> <6dc9ffc81003020608s10b76867kc04404a57df45df1@mail.gmail.com> <20100302150446.GB20342@caradoc.them.org> <838waa4nj1.fsf@gnu.org> <6dc9ffc81003021101yf91df69nddd08a824f777641@mail.gmail.com> <83y6ia30nc.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 21:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <6dc9ffc81003021306s7cf79ef5n1069d8dcc994a3c6@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: PATCH: Support x86 pseudo registers From: "H.J. Lu" To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: dan@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2 On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 11:01:42 -0800 >> From: "H.J. Lu" >> Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sourceware.org >> >> How about >> >> --- >> * X86 general purpose registers >> >> =A0 GDB now supports reading/writing byte, word and double word x86 >> =A0 general purpose registers directly. >> --- > > Thanks, this is much better. =A0However, could we also tell what GDB > features and/or commands would benefit from this support? > I am not familiar with that part. I could use some help. Thanks. --=20 H.J.