From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2800 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2010 18:59:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 2781 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Feb 2010 18:59:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-fx0-f209.google.com (HELO mail-fx0-f209.google.com) (209.85.220.209) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:59:17 +0000 Received: by fxm1 with SMTP id 1so1799082fxm.4 for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:59:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.89.130 with SMTP id c2mr2335362wef.44.1265223554585; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:59:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6dc9ffc81002030708n413c1784g3979207a08cdd9c7@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100203040339.GA24984@lucon.org> <20100203135848.GA27938@caradoc.them.org> <6dc9ffc81002030605k6eadda3me45828f7c8c6a362@mail.gmail.com> <20100203142202.GB28951@caradoc.them.org> <6dc9ffc81002030634wd2976e5t2a42b639c455b850@mail.gmail.com> <20100203144626.GA31389@caradoc.them.org> <6dc9ffc81002030708n413c1784g3979207a08cdd9c7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: <6dc9ffc81002031059y428b0103q50409ce5745f7cd9@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: RFC: Support target specific qSupported From: "H.J. Lu" To: "H.J. Lu" , GDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00086.txt.bz2 On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 7:08 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Daniel Jacobowitz = wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 06:34:14AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote: >>> We have our own remote gdb stub, which needs to talk to both old gdb, >>> which only understands SSE g/G packet, and new gdb, which understands >>> AVX g/G packet. Does the target description support negotiation so >>> that old gdb and new remote gdb stub can use SSE g/G packet? >> >> The goal of target descriptions is to not need negotiation. >> Everything is controlled by the target. =A0But with older GDBs, because >> x86 did not get target-described register support right away, there's >> a problem. > > It is not a trivial to implement target-described register support > for x86. But I think it is a good thing to do. > I am working x86 target descriptions. MMX is alias of ST. How do I do it? Thanks. --=20 H.J.