From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19764 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2009 16:24:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 19756 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Mar 2009 16:24:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Mar 2009 16:24:33 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so1789483wfg.24 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2009 09:24:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.31.11 with SMTP id i11mr2021124wfj.289.1237652671515; Sat, 21 Mar 2009 09:24:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20090320220041.GA26894@lucon.org> Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 16:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: <6dc9ffc80903210924i10a807f6n320d93ca23e07fef@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: RFC: Support DW_TAG_entry_point From: "H.J. Lu" To: tromey@redhat.com Cc: GDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00446.txt.bz2 On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "H" =3D=3D H J Lu writes: > > HJ> I have a patch to support DW_TAG_entry_point. Should I submit it > HJ> with a ChangeLog entry? > > Yes. =A0A rationale for the patch would also be helpful, at least to me. > DW_TAG_entry_point may be used by Fortran compiler. But gcc doesn't use it. I guess one reason is gdb doesn't support it. Is this good enough? --=20 H.J.