From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 47483 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2017 18:32:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 46767 invoked by uid 89); 17 Apr 2017 18:32:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=formally, stock X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:32:21 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.90.203]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1d0BRk-0000Yn-Tu from Luis_Gustavo@mentor.com ; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 11:32:20 -0700 Received: from [172.30.15.116] (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 11:32:18 -0700 Reply-To: Luis Machado Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PR threads/20743: Don't attempt to suspend or resume exited threads. References: <20170404173258.6512-1-jhb@FreeBSD.org> <6029590.iEtzOUCDnR@ralph.baldwin.cx> <14140503.xzYTI4WuLb@ralph.baldwin.cx> To: John Baldwin CC: From: Luis Machado Message-ID: <6b79429a-d7a5-4355-01e5-61f55fc84669@codesourcery.com> Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:32:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <14140503.xzYTI4WuLb@ralph.baldwin.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-orw-mbx-04.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.204) To svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.203) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-04/txt/msg00499.txt.bz2 On 04/17/2017 01:27 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Friday, April 14, 2017 08:01:25 PM Luis Machado wrote: >> On 04/14/2017 05:40 PM, John Baldwin wrote: >>>> Otherwise i have no further comments. I assume you ran gdb's testsuite >>>> against this change and verified the results are sane? >>> >>> There were no regressions at least. With the stock tree there are >>> several unexpected failures already which I will get to at some point. >>> >> >> Great. I have no further comments. > > To be clear (since I believe I messed this up before), I still need approval > from an approver? > Right. I'm mainly reviewing. I can't formally approve.