From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 102248 invoked by alias); 12 Sep 2017 10:03:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 102239 invoked by uid 89); 12 Sep 2017 10:03:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=phil, Phil, H*M:d91e X-HELO: mail-wr0-f174.google.com Received: from mail-wr0-f174.google.com (HELO mail-wr0-f174.google.com) (209.85.128.174) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:03:43 +0000 Received: by mail-wr0-f174.google.com with SMTP id a43so20073309wrc.0 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 03:03:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:from:to:references:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4CKWhWfhOOZpK70kMUKtr7+V8pmoZYJ+YKTAByRhkvA=; b=LQyBW6/xoFY2JImkogABpCeNwaC1DwPtZt+n9IMerSeRSUuodG1NU6uPQ7qbY24sAf /Z68ZK/TaQxYJWlhw9sgtnXoxB46AO9dGomZLH54i2Or4qJyRjgdPzFtdGeG8yCexfhk xPtcSf/rQjls71GU3r1jWGq7lfs12VSLc+ohu/QVyskxBjzXs8zBT9o1Wuku86n5+aZ7 xiC2F2wlgxkzc22JGjW9j9eRQRMdisUjtr57niakA7/UWOn1rJCq6jseuT5PnYxm706z mOmN9xOwK+E+mDchhhgUZyxGM8M1R5RJZ+ucdPdBFMW2WFy8r+Jtm1nNgYEDuU+zr5u4 Z/Zw== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUguyC0HymbeWQSRXiHDDdL9wJcexhOSqVwYq21xI/poQ0ccCV0E p3irxkrq6A5CCmNvriT7iA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb6Yezm8w1e5uwHDTg7r1Jkd5B2S4euQJhlEXWLGEfdgM+FxHN9rIXyVzI4kwkMqfN0NpZnfrw== X-Received: by 10.223.152.117 with SMTP id v108mr12547642wrb.76.1505210621379; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 03:03:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:c7f:ae15:7800:4685:ff:fe66:9f4? ([2a02:c7f:ae15:7800:4685:ff:fe66:9f4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f17sm2378597wmf.47.2017.09.12.03.03.39 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Sep 2017 03:03:39 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [python] Allow explicit locations in breakpoints. From: Phil Muldoon To: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" References: <04ccc2c4-7827-eedc-d8db-a83a0167acb6@redhat.com> Message-ID: <6b384fb2-4374-bfa9-d91e-88dbdb508427@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:03:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <04ccc2c4-7827-eedc-d8db-a83a0167acb6@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-09/txt/msg00327.txt.bz2 On 23/08/17 14:58, Phil Muldoon wrote: > > Hello, > > This minor patch allows for explicit locations to be specified in the > gdb.Breakpoint constructor. It's a minor tweak, and the patch largely > consists of tests to make sure the existing explicit locations > mechanisms work in Python. Ping on this.