From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 91558 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2017 21:49:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 91540 invoked by uid 89); 29 Nov 2017 21:49:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KB_WAM_FROM_NAME_SINGLEWORD,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=delivering, lunch X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:49:04 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDF96C053FC1; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:49:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00D055EDE2; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:49:02 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: time to create the GDB 8.1.x branch? To: Joel Brobecker References: <20171128194442.8103FD80317@oc3748833570.ibm.com> <783661b7-869e-cc95-6767-ff89e2634359@redhat.com> <20171129210045.3n643j2ob2c3szfl@adacore.com> Cc: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <6b08f762-aede-691f-702c-39602c884e33@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:49:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171129210045.3n643j2ob2c3szfl@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-11/txt/msg00800.txt.bz2 On 11/29/2017 09:00 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >>> I agree. Your suggestion sounded good to me. I just haven't >>> yet had time to try it out. I wouldn't be offended if someone >>> beat me to it... :-) >> >> I tried it now and it seems to work fine, and the test I had added >> works on ppc too with that fix. I'll some more testing and >> post it after lunch. > > Thanks for the heads up and for delivering the fix so quickly. > As far as I can tell, it's very close to getting in, so I will > not bother adding an item in the release wiki page. I assume > it will get in before some other pending patches do. But do let me > know if it somehow gets delayed and should be tracked in the release > wiki page! The patch is already in. :-) Thanks, Pedro Alves