From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id c+LJImRNaWOyBBUAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 13:24:36 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 821AF1E124; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 13:24:36 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3B0B1E0CB for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 13:24:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C108F38582AA for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 18:24:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from esa2.mentor.iphmx.com (esa2.mentor.iphmx.com [68.232.141.98]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 153F13858C3A; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 18:23:51 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 153F13858C3A Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codesourcery.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mentor.com X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,145,1665475200"; d="scan'208";a="86467711" Received: from orw-gwy-01-in.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.165]) by esa2.mentor.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 07 Nov 2022 10:23:49 -0800 IronPort-SDR: uH/2v3/gPOgoNloaFvDQAq3GlwXDzFB8R00tcoiFbY/kEir6T3YXTdEsKcoWioPGazgKAJBM3K DRpJ2rO1KoA9KyU75arLD/QE3S4j1s70ZAGnfSR0V75sX082O+5TbGsqyFJiEnHo6Di7bxuE+l Lxvfk9OycvBsvMxHgn5RQD4zag1r8SNgDZaxYj0uxA4PFOMal875z38Xmjjq/OsaenCDY9xYIj OVibz0+PxDhTumVaPnfzfObq7B+4eH8CGQLIx85y0QCtDXHNU4cudYtzE1/JtuWAOLsUX4N1Sn RNY= Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 18:23:45 +0000 From: Joseph Myers To: Alan Modra CC: Tom de Vries , , Subject: Re: [RFC][top-level] Add configure test-case In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <6a0ccc2-e4ab-c8f0-dffc-cd8f0f1369b@codesourcery.com> References: <20221020151027.GA1300@delia.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Originating-IP: [137.202.0.90] X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-ies-mbx-11.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.11) To svr-ies-mbx-10.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.10) X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On Mon, 7 Nov 2022, Alan Modra via Binutils wrote: > a) that top-level binutils/gdb patches don't get applied to the gcc > git repository in a timely manner, or If a toplevel patch is approved for either repository, I think you should treat it as approved for the other one without needing separate review. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com