From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 864 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2009 15:20:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 855 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Feb 2009 15:20:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_74,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from imr2.ericy.com (HELO imr2.ericy.com) (198.24.6.3) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:20:36 +0000 Received: from eusrcmw751.eamcs.ericsson.se (eusrcmw751.exu.ericsson.se [138.85.77.51]) by imr2.ericy.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n1GFGTPE021767; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:16:34 -0600 Received: from ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se ([142.133.1.72]) by eusrcmw751.eamcs.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:16:31 -0600 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-next" command error Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:10:00 -0000 Message-ID: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA06EEF948@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> In-Reply-To: References: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA04E1BF2D@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA06D3416B@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA06E85695@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA06EC2DCA@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> From: "Marc Khouzam" To: "teawater" Cc: "Michael Snyder" , "Pedro Alves" , X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00333.txt.bz2 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: teawater [mailto:teawater@gmail.com]=20 > Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 3:57 AM > To: Marc Khouzam > Cc: Michael Snyder; Pedro Alves; gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Subject: Re: [RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-next" command error >=20 > Hi Marc, >=20 > I try it again. This test is still OK with me. Could remove > stopped.diff patch and try it again? > Or send me a stopped.diff patch? The stopped.diff patch was just checked in. You will actually have to update record.c as it no longer compiles with those new changes (small fix needed.) =20 I updated to today's HEAD and I still get the problem. How did you turn on those traces to debug the problem? Thanks Marc