Re: [RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-next" command error

Hui Zhu
2009-05-06T06:01:38Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1305 bytes --]

Hi Michael,

I try this issue with cvs-head. It still affect cvs-head.
And I try the patch, it can fix this issue. It's time close to 7.0
branch. So could you please help me review it?

The attachment is the new patch follow cvs-head.

2009-05-06 Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>

* infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Make inferior step if it
stepping over a function call in reverse , and stop at the
start address of the function.

Thanks,
Hui

On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 17:00, teawater <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> This patch is for bug in http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2009-01/msg00146.html
>
> This issue is because sometime the inferior is already in function
> start address (i.e. plt), set a breakpoint and continue will make
> "reverse-next" work error.
>
> This patch make inferior step if it reverse step and stop at the
> function start address.
> It tested OK with process record patch and testsuite gdb.twreverse in
> branch reverse-20081226-branch.
>
> 2009-01-22  Hui Zhu  <teawater@gmail.com>
>
>        * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Make inferior step if it
>        stepping over a function call in reverse , and stop at the
>        start address of the function.
>
> OK for mainline?
>
> Thanks,
> Hui
>

[-- Attachment #2: fix-reverse-plt-error.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1069 bytes --]

---
infrun.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/infrun.c
+++ b/infrun.c
@@ -3558,10 +3558,21 @@ infrun: BPSTAT_WHAT_SET_LONGJMP_RESUME (
keep_going (ecs);
return;
}
- /* Normal (staticly linked) function call return. */
- init_sal (&sr_sal);
- sr_sal.pc = ecs->stop_func_start;
- insert_step_resume_breakpoint_at_sal (sr_sal, null_frame_id);
+ if (ecs->stop_func_start != stop_pc)
+ {
+ /* Normal (staticly linked) function call return. */
+ init_sal (&sr_sal);
+ sr_sal.pc = ecs->stop_func_start;
+ insert_step_resume_breakpoint_at_sal (sr_sal, null_frame_id);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /* We are stepping over a function call in reverse, and
+ stop at the start address of the function. Go back to
+ single-stepping, which should take us back to the
+ function call. */
+ ecs->event_thread->stepping_over_breakpoint = 1;
+ }
}
else
insert_step_resume_breakpoint_at_caller (get_current_frame ());