From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-61616-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 27952 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2009 14:09:08 -0000
Received: (qmail 27943 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Feb 2009 14:09:07 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from imr2.ericy.com (HELO imr2.ericy.com) (198.24.6.3)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:08:58 +0000
Received: from eusrcmw750.eamcs.ericsson.se (eusrcmw750.exu.ericsson.se [138.85.77.50]) 	by imr2.ericy.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n1BE75ZO018962; 	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:07:05 -0600
Received: from ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se ([142.133.1.72]) by eusrcmw750.eamcs.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 	 Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:07:04 -0600
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [RFA] fix *stopped for CLI commands
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:09:00 -0000
Message-ID: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA06E8508F@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <200902102358.11736.vladimir@codesourcery.com>
References: <200902061045.18508.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA06E84D64@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> <200902102358.11736.vladimir@codesourcery.com>
From: "Marc Khouzam" <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>
To: "Vladimir Prus" <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
Cc: <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>, "Nick Roberts" <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00235.txt.bz2

=20

> From: Vladimir Prus
> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 3:58 PM
>=20
> Why does DSF use tokens at all? I probably can fix this up, but I am
> not sure the tokens are really necessary. Does anybody envision a case
> where GDB would report command results out-of-order?

We used tokens from the very start.  CDI uses them too, I believe.
I'm not sure if tokens are really nessary, but it is probably a little
risky to suddenly move away from them.

Marc