From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-54974-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 5171 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2008 13:33:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 5148 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Apr 2008 13:33:05 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from imr2.ericy.com (HELO imr2.ericy.com) (198.24.6.3)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 13:32:44 +0000
Received: from eusrcmw750.eamcs.ericsson.se (eusrcmw750.exu.ericsson.se [138.85.77.50]) 	by imr2.ericy.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m34DWOkR006103; 	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 08:32:24 -0500
Received: from ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se ([142.133.1.72]) by eusrcmw750.eamcs.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 	 Fri, 4 Apr 2008 08:32:24 -0500
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: Re: [Patch] Try2: -var-evaluate-expression [-f FORMAT] NAME
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:07:00 -0000
Message-ID: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA04291021@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <18419.63952.623990.501287@kahikatea.snap.net.nz>
From: "Marc Khouzam" <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>
To: "Nick Roberts" <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
Cc: "Vladimir Prus" <ghost@cs.msu.su>, <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00098.txt.bz2

> > > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 (*(value_of_variable)): Likewise.
> > >=20
> > > Is '*(value_of_variable)' really a name of a function? :-)
> >=20
> > After Daniel's comment, I'm not too sure what you guys do=20
> > for function pointers that are members....=20
> > so I removed this Changelog entry. :-)
>=20
> It still seems to be there.
>=20
You're good :-)
Between extracting the Changelog from the patch and getting the
different explanations about what to do about it, it got copied
into the email.  But I had actually removed it.

> 	(struct language_specific): Add format parameter to function member
> 	*value_of_variable.

I like your suggestion.  I will use that.

> Put "diff -p" in your ~/.cvsrc?

Good idea, but it turns out Eclipse does not use the .cvsrc file.
And I didn't find any other solution...

Marc