From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: simon.marchi@polymtl.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH,v2] Make language setting tests more robust
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 16:51:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <693288e6-921d-7ff2-e81f-4aa8ccdd75a3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22cf411e-ba69-723d-8289-71b636313c39@codesourcery.com>
On 02/06/2017 02:54 PM, Luis Machado wrote:
>
> The story here is that i noticed 3 tests with such a problem:
>
> FAIL: gdb.compile/compile-ifunc.exp: nodebug: set language c
> FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/data-loc.exp: set language ada
> FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dynarr-ptr.exp: set language ada
>
> And my build had a glibc with debugging symbols and sources, therefore
> GDB had set the initial language to asm before main.
There's a comment about that in gdb.compile/compile-ifunc.exp:
# This binary has no debug information, so force the language to C in case
# GDB happened to see real asm code when it stopped at the entry point
# when talking to a remote target, like gdbserver. This guarantees the
# feature check below will work.
gdb_test_no_output "set language c" ""
So the question is, why did the gdb_test_no_output work back then,
and doesn't now?
In top.c:check_frame_language_change()
[...]
if (has_stack_frames ())
{
enum language flang;
flang = get_frame_language (frame);
if (!warned
&& flang != language_unknown
&& flang != current_language->la_language)
{
printf_filtered ("%s\n", lang_frame_mismatch_warn);
warned = 1;
}
what does get_frame_language return? Isn't it returning
language_unknown for you? Why not?
> FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/data-loc.exp: set language ada
> FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dynarr-ptr.exp: set language ada
Likewise.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-06 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-01 15:17 [PATCH] " Luis Machado
2017-02-01 18:38 ` Simon Marchi
2017-02-01 19:22 ` Luis Machado
2017-02-01 19:25 ` Simon Marchi
2017-02-01 21:50 ` Keith Seitz
2017-02-01 23:29 ` Luis Machado
2017-02-02 1:24 ` Simon Marchi
2017-02-01 20:21 ` [PATCH,v2] " Luis Machado
2017-02-02 1:33 ` Simon Marchi
2017-02-03 0:37 ` Pedro Alves
2017-02-06 14:54 ` Luis Machado
2017-02-06 15:09 ` Luis Machado
2017-02-06 16:51 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2017-02-06 18:04 ` Luis Machado
2017-02-06 18:08 ` Pedro Alves
2017-02-06 18:22 ` Luis Machado
2017-02-06 18:24 ` Pedro Alves
2017-02-06 19:56 ` Luis Machado
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=693288e6-921d-7ff2-e81f-4aa8ccdd75a3@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=lgustavo@codesourcery.com \
--cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox