Re: [RFA] Type cleanups

Elena Zannoni
2002-05-13T15:51:16Z

Andrew Cagney writes:
>
> >> Did you check all the cross targets build per MAINTAINERS? From memory
> >> sh-hms[bfd] and avr[need to look] don't build at present (well as of
> >> ~2002-05-12-gmt).
> >>
> >> If that has been checked, then yes ``obviously''.
> >
> >
> > A few don't build; none of them are my fault. For the record:
> >
> > At least fr30-elf, mn10300-elf, and v850-elf have missing
> > dependencies off in sim/ land; they built with non-parallel make only.
>
> > hppa1.1-hp-proelf wants dl.h and machine/save_state.h in
> > hppa-tdep.c, and was already marked broken. The nice gawk segment
> > doesn't notice that...
>
> HP/UX isn't on the list. I get:
>
> hppa1.1-hp-proelf broken
>
> The note should probably mention that you normally want to stip out
> broken targets.
>
> > Several targets (i586-pc-msdosdjgpp, sparc-elf, sparc64-elf)
> > failed with this message (also JB_SP for Sparc):
> >
> > In file included from /usr/include/setjmp.h:30,
> > from ../../src-build/gdb/top.c:58:
> > /usr/include/bits/setjmp.h:31: warning: `JB_PC' redefined
> > tm.h:57: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
> > make[1]: *** [top.o] Error 1
>
> I don't get that on the three systems I use. Bug in the system library?
>
> >
> > sh-hms failed with a reference to some new SHmedia code.
>
> Yes, per above, BFD problem. sh-hms doesn't enable full SH support in BFD.
>

Yes.
I am looking into this right now.
Elena

> Andrew
>
>
>
>
>