Re: [RFA] Type cleanups

Andrew Cagney
2002-05-13T15:37:25Z

>> Did you check all the cross targets build per MAINTAINERS? From memory
>> sh-hms[bfd] and avr[need to look] don't build at present (well as of
>> ~2002-05-12-gmt).
>>
>> If that has been checked, then yes ``obviously''.
>
>
> A few don't build; none of them are my fault. For the record:
>
> At least fr30-elf, mn10300-elf, and v850-elf have missing
> dependencies off in sim/ land; they built with non-parallel make only.

> hppa1.1-hp-proelf wants dl.h and machine/save_state.h in
> hppa-tdep.c, and was already marked broken. The nice gawk segment
> doesn't notice that...

HP/UX isn't on the list. I get:

hppa1.1-hp-proelf broken

The note should probably mention that you normally want to stip out
broken targets.

> Several targets (i586-pc-msdosdjgpp, sparc-elf, sparc64-elf)
> failed with this message (also JB_SP for Sparc):
>
> In file included from /usr/include/setjmp.h:30,
> from ../../src-build/gdb/top.c:58:
> /usr/include/bits/setjmp.h:31: warning: `JB_PC' redefined
> tm.h:57: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
> make[1]: *** [top.o] Error 1

I don't get that on the three systems I use. Bug in the system library?

>
> sh-hms failed with a reference to some new SHmedia code.

Yes, per above, BFD problem. sh-hms doesn't enable full SH support in BFD.

Andrew