Re: [PATCHv2 5/5] gdb: Better support for dynamic properties with negative values

Tom Tromey
2019-07-10T15:03:06Z

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com> writes:

I meant to reply to this but forgot to. I'm sorry about that.

>> I wonder whether this should be using ULONGEST rather than CORE_ADDR
>> now.

Andrew> I don't think you're wrong, but I'm hoping I can convince you to let
Andrew> me punt this change for now, it would be fairly big change to the
Andrew> dwarf property fetching code. What we have seems to hang together for
Andrew> now, so I'd prefer to get this change in first.

Yes, I think it's fine to just move forward with the patch you've
written.

Tom