From: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
To: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>,
Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Possible regression on gdb.multi/multi-arch-exec.exp (was: Re: [PATCH] Use thread_info and inferior pointers more throughout)
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 18:39:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <670b9da0-762a-2ad4-80bc-012a279b29e9@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87in649jtd.fsf@redhat.com>
On 06/27/2018 11:16 AM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> ../../binutils-gdb/gdb/target.c:3200: internal-error: gdbarch* default_thread_architecture(target_ops*, ptid_t): Assertion `inf != NULL' failed.
> A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
> further debugging may prove unreliable.
> Quit this debugging session? (y or n) FAIL: gdb.multi/multi-arch-exec.exp: first_arch=1: selected_thread=1: follow_exec_mode=new: continue across exec that changes architecture (GDB internal error)
>
FWIW, I see this on HEAD on my F26 box in the test suite:
$ make check TESTS="gdb.multi/multi-arch-exec.exp gdb.base/foll-exec-mode.exp"
[snip]
FAIL: gdb.multi/multi-arch-exec.exp: first_arch=1: selected_thread=1: follow_exec_mode=new: continue across exec that changes architecture (GDB internal error)
ERROR: : spawn id exp10 not open
while executing
"expect {
-i exp10 -timeout 10
-re "Quit this debugging session\\? \\(y or n\\) $" {
send_gdb "n\n"
incr count
}
-re "Create a core..."
("uplevel" body line 1)
invoked from within
"uplevel $body" NONE : spawn id exp10 not open
[snip]
=== gdb Summary ===
# of expected passes 35
# of unexpected failures 8
# of unresolved testcases 13
Unlike Sergio, I haven't looked into this at all. ;-)
Keith
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-27 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-07 18:07 [PATCH] Use thread_info and inferior pointers more throughout Pedro Alves
2018-06-07 18:28 ` Tom Tromey
2018-06-21 15:57 ` Pedro Alves
2018-06-21 16:21 ` Pedro Alves
2018-06-25 10:18 ` Ulrich Weigand
2018-06-25 10:23 ` Pedro Alves
2018-06-27 11:34 ` Ulrich Weigand
2018-06-27 12:43 ` [PATCH] Fix Cell debugging regression (Re: [PATCH] Use thread_info and inferior pointers more throughout) Pedro Alves
2018-06-27 13:12 ` Ulrich Weigand
2018-06-27 13:17 ` Pedro Alves
2018-06-27 15:30 ` [PATCH v2] " Pedro Alves
2018-06-27 16:05 ` Ulrich Weigand
2018-06-27 16:25 ` Pedro Alves
2019-02-14 15:45 ` [PATCH] Use thread_info and inferior pointers more throughout Thomas Schwinge
2018-06-27 18:16 ` Possible regression on gdb.multi/multi-arch-exec.exp (was: Re: [PATCH] Use thread_info and inferior pointers more throughout) Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-06-27 18:39 ` Keith Seitz [this message]
2018-06-28 12:09 ` Possible regression on gdb.multi/multi-arch-exec.exp Pedro Alves
2018-06-28 16:02 ` [pushed] Fix follow-exec regression / crash (Re: Possible regression on gdb.multi/multi-arch-exec.exp) Pedro Alves
2018-06-28 16:37 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=670b9da0-762a-2ad4-80bc-012a279b29e9@redhat.com \
--to=keiths@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=sergiodj@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox