From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28447 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2004 19:31:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28432 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2004 19:31:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Feb 2004 19:31:27 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.153.156]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.4-GR) with ESMTP id CLT46580; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 21:31:03 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 19:31:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: David Carlton Message-Id: <6654-Wed11Feb2004213143+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, drow@mvista.com In-reply-to: (message from David Carlton on Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:15:27 -0800) Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] mention C++ support in NEWS Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00308.txt.bz2 > From: David Carlton > Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:15:27 -0800 > > +* C++ nested types and namespaces > + > +GDB's support for nested types and namespaces in C++ has been > +improved. We recommend that you use the DWARF 2 debugging format to > +get the full benefit from this; this is the default for recent > +versions of GCC on most platforms. > + IMHO, this text is okay, but perhaps it will sound much more useful if you add some examples of situations where GDB previously didn't work, and now does.