From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2770 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2003 19:36:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2752 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2003 19:36:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Nov 2003 19:36:05 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.153.167]) by legolas.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.7-GR) with ESMTP id AVD99871; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 21:35:20 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 19:36:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: David Carlton Message-Id: <6654-Mon24Nov2003213512+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from David Carlton on Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:02:27 -0800) Subject: Re: [commit] Deprecate remaining STREQ uses Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <3FC119EB.1060102@gnu.org> <3FC234C0.1000500@gnu.org> <20031124165047.GA2227@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00533.txt.bz2 > From: David Carlton > Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:02:27 -0800 > > I'm not sure that STREQ meets the second criterion - frequent > contributors are good about not adding new uses of it. We have ARI for that: even if new contributions escape Andrew's and Elena's hawkish eyes and use STREQ, ARI will flag them.