From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: nickrob@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Commit] New file
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 07:54:00 -0000
Message-id: <6654-Fri28May2004105116+0300-eliz@gnu.org>
References: <16563.42891.155614.609433@nick.uklinux.net> <6654-Wed26May2004124733+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <40B4C9A9.3040904@gnu.org> <6137-Thu27May2004102142+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <40B63FED.7080502@gnu.org>
X-SW-Source: 2004-05/msg00765.html

> Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 15:22:21 -0400
> From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
> 
> It's going to be a lot easier if both the client and server are there in 
> front of us.

What I suggest makes one of them a CVS command away, that's all.

> (For me personally, I'm not going to rush out and down load the latest 
> emacs, however I will be comfortable with using the latest gdb-mi.el 
> with a recent emacs release.)

The situation I fear is that the latest gdb-mi.el will not work with a
recent Emacs release.  We already had that with gdba.el, remember?

Anyway, I think the opinions are clear.  If you want to override my
objections, go ahead.