From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18221 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2004 18:22:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18206 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2004 18:22:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Apr 2004 18:22:53 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.152.239]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.5-GR) with ESMTP id BQB21270; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 21:22:33 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 18:22:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Orjan Friberg Message-Id: <6654-Fri23Apr2004212229+0300-eliz@gnu.org> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, drow@false.org In-reply-to: <4087DFB6.1030801@axis.com> (message from Orjan Friberg on Thu, 22 Apr 2004 17:07:34 +0200) Subject: Re: Display of read/access watchpoints when HAVE_NONSTEPPABLE_WATCHPOINT Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <407282F4.2080602@axis.com> <20040406142228.GA29473@nevyn.them.org> <6654-Thu15Apr2004111217+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <407E8CEF.2050007@axis.com> <407FC69A.1000701@axis.com> <1438-Sat17Apr2004112204+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <4083E930.8040005@axis.com> <4087DFB6.1030801@axis.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00579.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 17:07:34 +0200 > From: Orjan Friberg > > as far as I can tell target_stopped_data_address applies only to > hardware-assisted watchpoints, not software watchpoints. That's true: software watchpoints don't use target_stopped_data_address because they single-step the inferior and evaluate each watched expression by themselves. > Maybe that needs to be made more clear in the comment. A good idea, IMHO.