From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-32899-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 25492 invoked by alias); 7 May 2004 08:23:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 25464 invoked from network); 7 May 2004 08:23:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 May 2004 08:23:10 -0000
Received: from zaretski ([80.230.142.26])
	by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.6-GR)
	with ESMTP id CVL24762;
	Fri, 7 May 2004 11:07:16 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 08:23:00 -0000
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Ulrich Weigand <weigand@i1.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Message-Id: <6654-Fri07May2004110644+0300-eliz@gnu.org>
CC: orjan.friberg@axis.com, kettenis@chello.nl, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com,
        drow@false.org
In-reply-to: <200405062134.XAA05759@faui1d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
	(message from Ulrich Weigand on Thu, 6 May 2004 23:34:10 +0200 (CEST))
Subject: Re: Display of read/access watchpoints when HAVE_NONSTEPPABLE_WATCHPOINT
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References:  <200405062134.XAA05759@faui1d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00186.txt.bz2

> From: Ulrich Weigand <weigand@i1.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
> Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 23:34:10 +0200 (CEST)
> 
> Well, the current behaviour of GDB is correct on targets like s390
> that cannot implement target_stopped_data_address, while your suggested
> change would break such targets.   May I suggest that your change be
> implemented conditionally on whether the target supports it?
> 
> > So right now, target_stopped_data_address is almost an alias for
> > STOPPED_BY_WATCHPOINT, but it is IMHO wrong to continue this illusion
> > into the future.  Therefore, I like your patch better than the
> > alternative which would modify target_stopped_data_address.
> 
> Actually I didn't suggest modifying target_stopped_data_address.

Someone, perhaps not you, posted a patch that uses
STOPPED_BY_WATCHPOINT.  That was the patch I liked better; I
understand that it would work for s390 as well.