From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21902 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2017 17:13:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21885 invoked by uid 89); 14 Mar 2017 17:13:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 17:13:55 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx16.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0410480462; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 17:13:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6B82D5C1; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 17:13:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] inf-ptrace: Do not stop memory transfers after a single word To: Andreas Arnez , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: Cc: Simon Marchi From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <6640b187-bad5-a584-73b0-4e151a85fc3c@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 17:13:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-03/txt/msg00241.txt.bz2 On 03/14/2017 03:44 PM, Andreas Arnez wrote: > Version 1 is here: > > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-03/msg00043.html > > Changes from version 1: > > * "unsigned" -> "unsigned int" > > * Compare pointers with NULL explicitly. Pedantically, it should be "if (errno != 0)" and "*xfered_len != 0 ? ...." as well. > > * Move the ptrace peek/poke loop to a separate routine for better > readability. > > OK to apply? LGTM. Thanks, Pedro Alves