From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B342A396EC88 for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 19:12:53 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org B342A396EC88 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark@simark.ca Received: from [10.0.0.193] (unknown [192.222.164.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E56B1E79B; Thu, 14 May 2020 15:12:53 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Remove obsolete GDBserver ports To: Kevin Buettner , Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches Cc: Simon Marchi References: <20200514174359.2272960-1-simon.marchi@efficios.com> <20200514115941.28c3cfcb@f31-4.lan> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <6530a198-abe3-82bb-d48e-c877605cc860@simark.ca> Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 15:12:52 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200514115941.28c3cfcb@f31-4.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: tl Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 19:13:04 -0000 On 2020-05-14 2:59 p.m., Kevin Buettner via Gdb-patches wrote: > On Thu, 14 May 2020 13:43:52 -0400 > Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches wrote: > >> This series implements the removal of obsolete gdbserver ports, as discussed >> here: >> >> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-May/168361.html >> >> I'm not in a hurry to merge this. I don't recall the exact process for >> removing support for a platform/architecture from GDB/GDBserver (I could >> document it on the wiki if someone points me to it, if it's not already there). >> If needed, we can announce these ports as deprecated for the next GDB release >> (10.1 ?), and then merge this series in master right after we have created the >> gdb-10-branch. Or if you think this is unnecessary, we can merge it right >> away, I don't mind. > > I'm in favor of this patch series going in. > > I looked over each part. They all LGTM. > > Kevin > Thanks Kevin. Note that patch 7/7 didn't go through at first, so you might want to look at it too. Simon