From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id OF4xNi/mZGSNuQwAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 17 May 2023 10:35:27 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id D382A1E11E; Wed, 17 May 2023 10:35:27 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=Qelfn74l; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 566BB1E0D6 for ; Wed, 17 May 2023 10:35:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49BFE3854152 for ; Wed, 17 May 2023 14:35:24 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 49BFE3854152 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1684334124; bh=Do8LyxvyDT33HJeTcJMIBybwUsfjBkBqtBB3WAsUIoU=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=Qelfn74l1iYWD1L93zXvq7lwlqHJtYJ+vSNpCiF5Mle2Ej1RdzYSQcw7Ar6NKUh7H u9vjN4EejhzDsVOykydCykAP8EkiAh/eJ0SgqFsBPIg9D6tGOiKH1yZQIvldVqazQN Qov6M1MFhXW34lLMvzxuxkbQ89+CmaSGBU8xZexc= Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89EAE3858D1E; Wed, 17 May 2023 14:35:02 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 89EAE3858D1E Received: from [172.16.0.192] (192-222-143-198.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.143.198]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B0F21E0D6; Wed, 17 May 2023 10:35:00 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <64b12aa0-89e4-c6e7-aeb2-a7f7e2b1aa96@simark.ca> Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 10:35:00 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] [gdb]: add git trailer information on gdb/MAINTAINERS To: Bruno Larsen , Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org References: <20230516143826.3431583-1-blarsen@redhat.com> <20230516143826.3431583-2-blarsen@redhat.com> <83pm70z2hr.fsf@gnu.org> <83cz30yxox.fsf@gnu.org> <83728fde-a0e8-026b-d4d1-89975ff5ca28@simark.ca> <831qjfzo6n.fsf@gnu.org> <71a08d05-ce55-ec44-2804-13145283ef6b@redhat.com> Content-Language: fr In-Reply-To: <71a08d05-ce55-ec44-2804-13145283ef6b@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Simon Marchi Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > My reading of the kernel's documentation of the tag[1] makes it sound like it is a partial approval, especially the lines: > > | > > Acked-by: is not as formal as Signed-off-by:. It is a record that the acker > has at least reviewed the patch and has indicated acceptance.| > > And the only time I saw it used in QEMU seems to corroborate that reading. That said, I can be misunderstanding here (english is not my native language after all). > > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=HEAD#n441 Thanks for the pointers. It looks like Acked-By can fit a range of situations, as long as it fits in "I didn't look at all of it or didn't do a thoroug review, but what I have seen LGTM". I think it fits my use case of just reading the commit message and agreeing with that. Simon