From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 123507 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2016 13:49:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 122791 invoked by uid 89); 20 Jul 2016 13:49:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*M:38b7, H*M:977b X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 13:49:54 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 267B57EA90; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 13:49:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u6KDnpPk002710; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:49:52 -0400 Subject: Re: [testsuite patch] Skip py-unwind.exp on x86_64 -m32 To: Yao Qi References: <20160717143003.GA12147@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20160718113348.GA25789@host1.jankratochvil.net> Cc: Jan Kratochvil , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , Sergio Durigan Junior From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <64a6e349-ccc1-977b-38b7-334bfbeeb28c@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 13:49:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-07/txt/msg00214.txt.bz2 On 07/20/2016 12:20 PM, Yao Qi wrote: >> > > Well, that is fine by me, because I don't plan to port this test to > arm or aarch64 > recently. OK, thanks. Jan, please go ahead with your patch then. -- Pedro Alves