From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20570 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2002 18:33:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20561 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2002 18:33:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO odin.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Oct 2002 18:33:24 -0000 Received: from Zaretsky ([80.230.2.40]) by odin.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.1.0.58-GA) with ESMTP id AOU24947; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 21:32:46 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 11:33:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: carlton@math.stanford.edu Message-Id: <6480-Tue01Oct2002213244+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from David Carlton on 30 Sep 2002 11:32:35 -0700) Subject: Re: [patch] fnchange.lst Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2 > From: David Carlton > Date: 30 Sep 2002 11:32:35 -0700 > > On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 07:24:27 +0200 (IST), Eli Zaretskii said: > > On 27 Sep 2002, David Carlton wrote: > > > This one is not needed; the gdb.c++ -> gdb.cxx transformation will > > be performed automatically. > > I see; thanks for the info. > > Should I go through fnchange.lst and get rid of all the gdb.c++ -> > gdb.cxx transformations except for the the first one (renaming the > directory) and the m-static1.cc one that I added? Oops, sorry. I see that I was wrong: all files in gdb.c++ directory need to be explicitly renamed like you did in your original patch. I'm terribly sorry for any inconvenience.