From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15729 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2004 21:12:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15386 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2004 21:12:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 5 Jun 2004 21:12:03 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-196-13.inter.net.il [80.230.196.13]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id DAH79065; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 00:11:25 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 21:12:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Randolph Chung Message-Id: <6480-Sun06Jun2004000849+0300-eliz@gnu.org> CC: cagney@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20040605162322.GV601@tausq.org> (message from Randolph Chung on Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:23:23 -0700) Subject: Re: [patch/rfa] function descriptor handling for push_dummy_call Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20040604061024.GQ601@tausq.org> <40C0C30C.7020308@gnu.org> <1438-Sat05Jun2004131412+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <40C1CC51.1020706@gnu.org> <1659-Sat05Jun2004185545+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <20040605162322.GV601@tausq.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00105.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:23:23 -0700 > From: Randolph Chung > > > > I think it is, the parameter is now a `struct value' function and not a > > > function's code address. > > > > The suggested change doesn't indicate that in any way. > > Agreed.... but the documentation as it is does not give the types of the > arguments, nor does it have any explanation in the text about what the > arguments are.... so I'm not sure what else i can do. How about adding a sentence saying that the `function' arg's type is `struct value'?