Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: drow@mvista.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix watchpoints when stepping over a breakpoint
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 23:38:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6480-Fri05Apr2002103430+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020402184333.A8464@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Tue, 2 Apr 2002 18:43:33 -0500)

> Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 18:43:33 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
> 
> When I tried it I got stuck
> on the bp_shlib_event breakpoint.  We would hit it, remove, single-step
> (trap expected), check where we were... and find ourselves at the
> shared library breakpoint again because of DECR_PC_AFTER_BREAK!
> 
> Instead, I now collect only non-breakpoint events.

Isn't this a bit ad hoc?  I think the issue of doing TRT when both a
breakpoint and a watchpoint fire for the same instruction needs a more
general solution.  While ignoring breakpoints might be the Right Thing
in this particular case, I wonder what will be TRT in other cases?

Did you try to arrange for a normal breakpoint and a watchpoint on the
same instruction, and see what happens in that case, with and without
this patch?


  reply	other threads:[~2002-04-05  7:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-02 15:43 Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-04 23:38 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2002-04-05  7:54   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-05  8:45     ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-04-05  9:08       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-05  9:55         ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-05 23:48         ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-04-06  7:36           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-06  9:21             ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-04-06  9:49               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-07  9:16                 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-07 10:03                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-04-14 14:49                     ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-14 22:07                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-04-18 18:34                         ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-02 22:18 Michael Elizabeth Chastain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6480-Fri05Apr2002103430+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il \
    --to=eliz@is.elta.co.il \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox