Re: Generated GDB documentation have colliding files on a case insensitive files system

[Torbjorn SVENSSON via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>]

On 2023-01-07 12:08, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2023 11:52:45 +0100
>> CC: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
>> From: Torbjorn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com>
>>
>> On 2023-01-07 11:43, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>>> Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2023 10:42:11 +0100
>>>> CC: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
>>>> From: Torbjorn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com>
>>>>
>>>> Do you see any use of the ~214 redirect pages in the GDB context?
>>>
>>> Sorry, I don't understand the question.  What do you mean by "see any
>>> use" in this context?
>>
>> I was considering if the redirect files could simply be removed from the
>> GDB documentation tree or if they are actually used for inter components
>> references.
> 
> They are produced by makeinfo, and they are produced for a reason, no?

According to the other thread, they are generated to easy cross linking 
the documentation. There is nothing in the documentation that will 
generate a link to any of these files, so hence the question if they are 
needed by GDB.

> 
>> I'm more or less trying to find the best solution for GDB.
>>
>> There is the possibility to rename one of the [qQ]MemTags anchors in the
>> GDB documentation, but that will also include the alternative name in
>> the redirect page and it would require all the @xref etc to be updated
>> to the renamed anchor.
>>
>> Even if we get a solution merged in texinfo, it will take years for it
>> to get activity used, and in the mean while, we are stuck with this
>> issue in GDB.
> 
> I still don't want to make any conclusions until the Texinfo
> discussion is completed.  How do you know there's no solution with the
> existing Texinfo versions?

As I understood it, it was proved that the redirect pages were colliding 
and no way around that in current implementation, but maybe I 
misunderstood the reply...