From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11566 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2016 16:14:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 11539 invoked by uid 89); 6 Oct 2016 16:14:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=clearer, Hx-languages-length:658, learn X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 16:14:51 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A80B5CA646; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 16:14:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u96GEnI5019571; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 12:14:50 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFA] Remove Java support To: Tom Tromey References: <1475679082-29898-1-git-send-email-tom@tromey.com> <87int5ebke.fsf@tromey.com> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <635b427e-1e73-be19-482a-c95ef3ed02c0@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2016 16:14:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87int5ebke.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2 On 10/06/2016 04:34 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: > >>> If this goes in, I intend to also close all the open java bugs as >>> "wontfix". > > Pedro> Fine with me. > > I'll push it in soon-ish. > > Pedro> Do you also plan on removing the java demangling support from > Pedro> libiberty? > > I don't know. The idea occurred to me but my spare time hacking is > rather random, so who knows. If someone else gets there first, I won't > be sad. Understood. I was mainly wondering if you thought we should keep it for some reason. I need to learn to be clearer. Thanks, Pedro Alves