From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id mCC9B6rh+V9CVQAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 12:02:34 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 12BF41EE11; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 12:02:34 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51A881E940 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 12:02:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5085385043B; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 17:02:32 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B5085385043B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1610211752; bh=plWOb+5lK/cC2h1X4d76a9tqrwZrML0XSkN3P39I3iY=; h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=qha0VQY8fxMxjAT2n1DNR0s3iN4+DEoKZ6x5R6a4INcXO+Gym2iVkSdPeJkMjFMVD oyqOvJKS2LjS2oXQ6Pk4wzfOw/p+MEw37fLf9nb3YJ22UawvyCKWP+R0JhX39mgnND D5FtUyy+A5txS38ZKBYUVWSMNArXLi4A20cFEbcg= Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (smtp.polymtl.ca [132.207.4.11]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAB8E3857C6F for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 17:02:30 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org DAB8E3857C6F Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 109H2O15030641 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 9 Jan 2021 12:02:29 -0500 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.polymtl.ca 109H2O15030641 Received: from [10.0.0.213] (192-222-157-6.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.157.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 09BFC1E940; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 12:02:23 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] sim: ChangeLog: move arch-specific entries into the arch dir To: Andrew Burgess , Tom Tromey References: <20210107080947.10821-1-vapier@gentoo.org> <20210107093337.GM2945@embecosm.com> <20210107171236.GJ7494@vapier> <87tursv51x.fsf@tromey.com> <20210108095746.GV2945@embecosm.com> Message-ID: <618e3a08-8239-8b9d-1f12-4e808a8f514c@polymtl.ca> Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2021 12:02:23 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210108095746.GV2945@embecosm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Poly-FromMTA: (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) at Sat, 9 Jan 2021 17:02:24 +0000 X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Simon Marchi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 2021-01-08 4:57 a.m., Andrew Burgess wrote: > * Tom Tromey [2021-01-07 13:57:14 -0700]: > >> Mike> merging them into one causes extra pain due to conflicts. having sep >> Mike> arch ones alleviates that a little as you don't normally have people >> Mike> working on the same arch at the same time. >> >> Mike> ideally we'd throw away these archaic ChangeLog files entirely. they >> Mike> are a huge waste of time for everyone and would be much better served >> Mike> writing proper git commit messages. it isn't the 80s/90s anymore. >> >> I'm +1 on that, but other maintainers like them, so we've been keeping >> them around. > > For the record I see them as a waste of time too. Well, I'm not a maintainer of the sim project, but the maintainers of the sim project could decide to not do ChangeLogs anymore. See the section that talks about VCS: https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Change-Logs.html Simon