From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C725388A01A for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:02:50 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 1C725388A01A Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark@simark.ca Received: from [10.0.0.11] (unknown [192.222.164.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 481591E581; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 10:02:49 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb: stop using host-dependent signal numbers in, windows-tdep.c To: Pedro Alves , Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: Jon Turney References: <20200316170845.184386-1-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> <4c7333df-41ca-8cf3-0569-db95564b698e@redhat.com> <851468fb-5b6a-e43d-14ae-8ad6fc5d343a@polymtl.ca> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <5f9ed4c0-9982-bab9-551c-9b7e60d4ac68@simark.ca> Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 10:02:48 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US-large Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 14:02:51 -0000 On 2020-04-02 10:00 a.m., Pedro Alves wrote: > On 4/2/20 4:06 AM, Simon Marchi wrote: >> On 2020-04-01 5:56 p.m., Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches wrote: > >>> Ok, I'll see what I can do. >> >> Here's a patch that does that. Note that I have only built-tested it. I'm so >> inefficient with Windows that if I wait until I have the time to actually try >> it, I'll never get it done. So I'm hoping that the Windows gurus can give it >> a look. > > Wow, thanks for doing this. Most excellent. > > It looks good to me. > > Thanks, > Pedro Alves Thanks. I'll give some time to Jon and/or Eli to take a look before pushing. Simon