From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id ya4jLb3cHWQFghgAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 13:24:13 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id A4D491E223; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 13:24:13 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=bLdgUtTY; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39E5F1E110 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 13:24:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6F7B385482D for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 17:24:12 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D6F7B385482D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1679678652; bh=DyuM5dZfxa7OHPJYLPA5KAQumPBnxAW7zZLQEmfB5rY=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=bLdgUtTYkxHK/nYe5ArImN3PO2Y76gllSQ66WGTOuv2PYmi0EkvMF5KyrlVV8/anE 5FQniFUaUzm8cpuxbbT+VHGm0egqu44snosGuioTxC3l/fLaktN7qOUL5uBXhGIDpu K+pVRjg/AtScU738HgNggUBY45334QppslUao89k= Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 856313858D1E for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 17:23:51 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 856313858D1E Received: from [172.16.42.115] (modemcable092.73-163-184.mc.videotron.ca [184.163.73.92]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1692A1E110; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 13:23:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <5e60a837-b21c-011f-c94e-e8bbf7645c5d@simark.ca> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 13:23:50 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 ] PowerPC: fix for gdb.reverse/finish-precsave.exp and gdb.reverse/finish-reverse.exp Content-Language: fr To: Carl Love , Tom de Vries , Ulrich Weigand , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , Bruno Larsen , "pedro@palves.net" References: <65d44121-65f7-a212-79ec-07ce53c15ecb@suse.de> <9fe94c0979cb40979b0dea7693a901c2d9f66164.camel@us.ibm.com> <59417813-eb4a-baf8-4e5d-e225d6732f71@suse.de> <7a494157-494f-6adf-d533-bf373b0f054f@redhat.com> <71aa635593df0677811afb85409aa190bcfa4f6a.camel@us.ibm.com> <15864a6b87b25c93e99a28149f23138267735f2a.camel@us.ibm.com> <041f62e9f26fd4a536bc90c34f072985582e6237.camel@de.ibm.com> <46c2c756475ba5923d7eed97996632a08285dd42.camel@us.ibm.com> <65861786-069e-53a1-ca17-a525b6629c95@suse.de> <5be0c849abeef84d34a6ff255fb2705ca5dcb035.camel@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <5be0c849abeef84d34a6ff255fb2705ca5dcb035.camel@us.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Simon Marchi Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 3/1/23 15:59, Carl Love via Gdb-patches wrote: > Tom, Ulrich, Bruno, Pedro, GDB maintainers: > > This patch fixes the reverse-finish command on PowerPC. The command > now works the same as on other architectures, specifically X86. There > are no functional changes for other architectures. The patch includes > a new testcase to verify the reverse-finish command works correctly > with the multiple entry points supported by PowerPC. > > > Patch tested on PowerPC and 5th generation X86 with no regression > failures. > > Carl Hi Carl, I don't know if that particular failure has been reported yet, but I see these failures when running with native-gdbserver or native-extended-gdbserver: $ make check TESTS="gdb.reverse/finish-reverse-next.exp" RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=native-gdbserver" FAIL: gdb.reverse/finish-reverse-next.exp: reverse-finish function1 LEP call from LEP FAIL: gdb.reverse/finish-reverse-next.exp: reverse next 1 LEP entry point function call from LEP FAIL: gdb.reverse/finish-reverse-next.exp: reverse next 2, at b = 5, call from LEP FAIL: gdb.reverse/finish-reverse-next.exp: reverse-finish function1 LEP call from function body FAIL: gdb.reverse/finish-reverse-next.exp: reverse next 1 LEP from function body FAIL: gdb.reverse/finish-reverse-next.exp: reverse next 2 at b = 5, from function body FAIL: gdb.reverse/finish-reverse-next.exp: function1 GEP call call from GEP FAIL: gdb.reverse/finish-reverse-next.exp: reverse next 1 GEP entry point function call from GEP FAIL: gdb.reverse/finish-reverse-next.exp: reverse next 2 at b = 50, call from GEP FAIL: gdb.reverse/finish-reverse-next.exp: function1 GEP call call from GEP again FAIL: gdb.reverse/finish-reverse-next.exp: reverse next 1 GEP entry point function call from GEP again FAIL: gdb.reverse/finish-reverse-next.exp: reverse next 2 at b = 50, call from GEP again FAIL: gdb.reverse/finish-reverse-next.exp: reverse-finish function1 GEP call, from function body FAIL: gdb.reverse/finish-reverse-next.exp: reverse next 1 GEP call from function body FAIL: gdb.reverse/finish-reverse-next.exp: reverse next 2 at b = 50 from function body Simon