From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id AsiwHKWnYGl2qTQAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 09 Jan 2026 02:00:53 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1767942053; bh=pMOzECmnefWU7JTHxwtkmLZ8UAVSMTOZZY3drfNJWdQ=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=Olf9YOmR8joBuFd/D22VYms9vhb16fOfzMBOtAofwRpttXpWCL40JSa8v6KB5reBe 4qkRslJ0+3E+3bZB1D/A+7oY+xQb4tguHqF7eNelAjjKX+WAcyrCU9htqurz1xHDq4 epwHrusHWSB0Ad0YuDjBVQwpnKiuh5BNVmdldEnY= Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 63C761E0B6; Fri, 09 Jan 2026 02:00:53 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=simark.ca header.i=@simark.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=J81BPG9G; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (vm01.sourceware.org [38.145.34.32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C10F11E048 for ; Fri, 09 Jan 2026 02:00:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 556154BA2E2B for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2026 07:00:52 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 556154BA2E2B Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=simark.ca header.i=@simark.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=J81BPG9G Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1B834BA2E04 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2026 07:00:27 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org E1B834BA2E04 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark.ca ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org E1B834BA2E04 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=158.69.221.121 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1767942028; cv=none; b=SkvW2XdjIArQPeFowMDJ6LhJYxzgMplYOrL/DcQGmLDpnB6GsHlg23jjd6nGyLApMN5WjkLBSbqUKtZpfswe6bF8tIuFJBTlJ7UGrYVNb1JzDMAUronTn5jaiWCpGCTvoPCpdDNQ6KkgyDrkTY+D27PrczG0rrmTbtNi/evoQao= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1767942028; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pMOzECmnefWU7JTHxwtkmLZ8UAVSMTOZZY3drfNJWdQ=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=sKUSBlijW01vLT+530r4lwNWaLcPMx/7pnn9nT1i2TSTytmX0wV9NruaoJTAXIYlOL1W64r7Xhdxw7b6vw8JCfy9QDpIPHw5SY9cRHPG5MHnvXfr/Nn2KrqceX8w7mjp7FdrufPNsRg5XKIB79nmfqi6UKASChMJiK5LCPaj2iQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E1B834BA2E04 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1767942027; bh=pMOzECmnefWU7JTHxwtkmLZ8UAVSMTOZZY3drfNJWdQ=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=J81BPG9G9Mg7RK/89qwz1tg2ysOtTyNxfCk7gccqDI+KGRWcQIM5jN+y78Cq5p0FL oNNVAp83/OeXm28kmLW9UUDWyhFiV6bb4TyTGul7uEKcTNYbYHoy8MipEu0udzdHKj dfhXm62KPPD3alfgjHvlSjbK/QQrEWyGow80p5OY= Received: by simark.ca (Postfix) id 317A21E048; Fri, 09 Jan 2026 02:00:27 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <5b3cf8e0-2b2e-4ece-9356-8ca5ab597ee0@simark.ca> Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 02:00:26 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: New ARI warning Wed Jan 7 02:00:25 GMT 2026 To: Kevin Buettner , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <87ms2pqouq.fsf@tromey.com> <20260108210409.2e667fa6@f42-mesa-1> Content-Language: en-US From: Simon Marchi In-Reply-To: <20260108210409.2e667fa6@f42-mesa-1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org On 2026-01-08 23:04, Kevin Buettner wrote: > On Wed, 07 Jan 2026 11:06:37 -0700 > Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>>>> GDB Administrator writes: >> >>> 340a341 >>>> gdb/dwarf2/read.c:11496: code: if assignment: An IF statement's expression contains an assignment (the GNU coding standard discourages this) >>> gdb/dwarf2/read.c:11496: if (struct type *containing_type = die_containing_type (die, cu); containing_type != nullptr) >> >> We should probably remove this ARI check; or even ARI itself. > > I'm in favor of the latter. +1. Simon