From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 125849 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2019 15:43:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 125841 invoked by uid 89); 11 Jul 2019 15:43:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: mail-wm1-f44.google.com Received: from mail-wm1-f44.google.com (HELO mail-wm1-f44.google.com) (209.85.128.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 15:43:20 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-f44.google.com with SMTP id p74so6143808wme.4 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 08:43:20 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ?IPv6:2001:8a0:f913:f700:56ee:75ff:fe8d:232b? ([2001:8a0:f913:f700:56ee:75ff:fe8d:232b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v204sm5349676wma.20.2019.07.11.08.43.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Jul 2019 08:43:18 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFA] Make first and last lines of 'command help documentation' consistent. To: Philippe Waroquiers , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20190616195804.9427-1-philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be> From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <5afc9e22-8c6e-f0fc-d4ba-7f84a0be5618@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 15:43:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190616195804.9427-1-philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2019-07/txt/msg00315.txt.bz2 On 6/16/19 8:58 PM, Philippe Waroquiers wrote: > With this patch, the help docs now respect 2 invariants: > * The first line of a command help is terminated by a '.' character. > * The last character of a command help is not a newline character. Can you split these parts of the patch from the validation parts? I.e., let's get the help fixes out of the way first. The validation parts can be discussed separately, and it's easier to distinguish them if they're not mixed up with the rest. Thanks, Pedro Alves