From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-97344-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 22156 invoked by alias); 26 Dec 2012 19:24:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 22143 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Dec 2012 19:24:12 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0	tests=BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,SPF_SOFTFAIL,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp1.digia.com (HELO smtp1.digia.com) (82.118.214.156)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:23:37 +0000
Received: from smtp1.digia.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])	by IMSVA80 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA3237005C;	Wed, 26 Dec 2012 21:23:35 +0200 (EET)
Received: from IT-EXCAS01-HKI.it.local (unknown [10.9.52.70])	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by smtp1.digia.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 047AF37005A;	Wed, 26 Dec 2012 21:23:35 +0200 (EET)
Received: from IT-EXMB01-HKI.it.local ([fe80::78ea:e84d:88b4:9f3d]) by IT-EXCAS01-HKI.it.local ([fe80::880f:35fb:7fe4:a7cf%14]) with mapi id 14.02.0283.003; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 21:23:34 +0200
From: Poenitz Andre <Andre.Poenitz@digia.com>
To: ext Aleksandar Ristovski <aristovski@qnx.com>,	"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: [patch] validate binary before use
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:24:00 -0000
Message-ID: <5F8A31884481A74D88C5F09BDA4231240F2CBC@IT-EXMB01-HKI.it.local>
References: <50D4C49A.6040502@qnx.com>
In-Reply-To: <50D4C49A.6040502@qnx.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00817.txt.bz2

Aleksandar Ristovski wrote:
> [...] Change introduces new target_so_ops function dedicated to performing
> validation. If we have loaded and relocated the object, validation
> fails, we throw away bfd and loading of the object fails. [...]

Does this change have any performance implications on the "normal"
use case, i.e. when all is set up and matches nicely?

Andre'