From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9961 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2009 19:53:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 9950 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Oct 2009 19:53:54 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.156) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:53:49 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 22so189996fge.12 for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:53:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.222.5 with SMTP id u5mr1536094fgg.67.1254426329849; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:45:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xpjpn (pool-71-111-147-240.ptldor.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.111.147.240]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm59557fge.26.2009.10.01.12.45.25 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:45:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Caz Yokoyama To: "'Joel Brobecker'" , "'Caz Yokoyama'" Cc: "'Eli Zaretskii'" , , References: <2C14068798BA41219F3603CDD24C8BC0@xpjpn> <20090929051929.GL9003@adacore.com> <7063C3E99BE344B2B98EDC0318ED852A@xpjpn> <20090929163910.GO9003@adacore.com> <93F096FEF7ED4579B52B23D69DA91195@xpjpn> <8363b0qm0n.fsf@gnu.org> <20090930201204.GH10338@adacore.com> <5650DA603A804427AA3B3F8F91164548@xpjpn> <20091001163330.GL10338@adacore.com> <0C6ED71F84CD48A9A37E2161011EF64B@xpjpn> <20091001193642.GO10338@adacore.com> Subject: RE: symbolic debug of loadable modules with kgdb light Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: <5F248D6C4A5B42F1A4C0D54F99BA2848@xpjpn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <20091001193642.GO10338@adacore.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2 > after all. I suggested break-g over SysRq-g because perhaps SysRq >could be implemented through a different character (?). I agree. BREAK-g is OK for you?. Eli may prefer also. -caz -----Original Message----- From: Joel Brobecker [mailto:brobecker@adacore.com] Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 12:37 PM To: Caz Yokoyama Cc: 'Eli Zaretskii'; pedro@codesourcery.com; gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: symbolic debug of loadable modules with kgdb light > >> +set remote interrupt-sequence [Ctrl-C | BREAK | SysRq-g] > >You changed the user interface again, this is really frustrating. > Sorry for frustrating you. The reason I changed is the following words by > Eli. OK - sorry if I snapped a little. I couldn't understand this even after re-reviewing the previous emails. I think you misunderstood what Eli said, but I will let him confirm (and re-explain) or deny that. As I said, either way is fine by me at this point, I just want the functionality to be there, and the naming is not hugely important after all. I suggested break-g over SysRq-g because perhaps SysRq could be implemented through a different character (?). > >Please use the same conventions for these keys as in the portion you are > replacing. >For example, BREAK should be in caps and control-c should be > spelled Ctrl-C. > > When interrupt sequence is controlled by remotebreak, the user does not need > to enter strings. On the other hand, s/he has to specify sequence name on > "set remote interrupt-sequence". In addition, the sequence name has to be > same on document and actual command. Therefore, I changed according to Eli. > Let me know what you want. -- Joel