From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Received: (qmail 30270 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2002 23:00:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dc-mx10.cluster1.charter.net) (209.225.8.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Nov 2002 23:00:34 -0000 Received: from [66.189.46.2] (HELO platinum.localnet) by dc-mx10.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9) with ESMTP id 25142220; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 18:00:25 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 17:15:00 -0000 Subject: Re: [rfa] linespec.c, part 3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v543) Cc: David Carlton , Jim Blandy , Fernando Nasser , Elena Zannoni , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com To: Daniel Jacobowitz From: Klee Dienes In-Reply-To: <20021111225612.GA28829@nevyn.them.org> Message-Id: <5A7058C0-F5C9-11D6-AA35-00039396EEB8@apple.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00330.txt.bz2 The patch I posted was against your branched linespec.c, in which you'd renamed decode_line_2 to select_symbols. If you like, I'd be happy to submit the patch as a patch against the TOT linespec.c assuming your patch 3 has been applied. On Monday, November 11, 2002, at 05:56 PM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > Dare I ask what you did with the existing decode_line_2, also in that > file? Other than that, it looks reasonable...