From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5550B3865491 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 14:14:00 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 5550B3865491 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark@simark.ca Received: from [10.0.0.11] (173-246-6-90.qc.cable.ebox.net [173.246.6.90]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 062AA1E5F9; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 10:14:00 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Fix crash if connection drops in scoped_restore_current_thread's ctor, part 1 To: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20200708233125.1030-1-pedro@palves.net> <20200708233125.1030-2-pedro@palves.net> <261491cd-7887-f99d-a73b-58167f6d4ca6@simark.ca> <8cde52bc-66d0-14e4-1af7-a770590670ae@palves.net> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <5927ee17-d0c3-2395-22bc-56d8d66409c3@simark.ca> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 10:13:59 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8cde52bc-66d0-14e4-1af7-a770590670ae@palves.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 14:14:01 -0000 On 2020-07-09 6:51 a.m., Pedro Alves wrote: >> `that that` >> > > That wasn't a typo, compare with: > > The problem is that this TARGET_CLOSE_ERROR > The problem is that those TARGET_CLOSE_ERRORs > The problem is that these TARGET_CLOSE_ERRORs > > https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/3418/how-do-you-handle-that-that-the-double-that-problem > > I'll say "that the" instead to avoid confusion. Haha, I see now. Yeah I think any alternative to `that that` is clearer. Simon