Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei-min Pan <weimin.pan@oracle.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb.base/siginfo-thread.exp: Increase timeout for 'gcore' command
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 18:27:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <58CAD90A.40809@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fc3924d7-e749-2b84-2c79-c1edc7dc1651@redhat.com>

Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 03/16/2017 04:00 PM, Wei-min Pan wrote:
>   
>> Yao Qi wrote:
>>     
>
>   
>>> Did you see timeout fails in all gcore related tests?  gdb_gcore_cmd is
>>> used in many places in gdb testsuite.  Did you investigate why it is so
>>> slow to generate coredump in gdb?
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> No, only this test failed with timeout and did so consistently. The
>> generated core file was fine.
>> We suspect the slow disk performance was the culprit.
>>     
>
> I agree with Yao, and I'm not convinced.  The generated core file is just
> "8.6M" on my x86_64 Fedora 23 and the test runs in under 1s here.
>
> $ time make check TESTS="*/siginfo-thread.exp"
> ...
> real    0m0.781s
> user    0m0.554s
> sys     0m0.152s
>
>
> What's the size of the core you get?  If you run the test manually,
> do we notice any kind of slowness?
>   

The core size is a little over 9.0M but it took much longer to run this 
individual test:

% time make check TESTS="*/siginfo-thread.exp"
...
real    0m11.743s
user    0m3.892s
sys     0m7.572s

And I didn't notice any slowness if the test was run by hand.

> If you have a general slowness issue in your testing host, then
> this should be affecting all gcore tests the same.  We have some
> tests that generate big cores on purpose even.
>   

Like I said, only this test consistently failed and the core file 
generated was not that big.

Thanks.

> Thanks,
> Pedro Alves
>
>   


  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-16 18:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-01  3:23 Weimin Pan
2017-03-16 14:45 ` Yao Qi
2017-03-16 16:00   ` Wei-min Pan
2017-03-16 17:08     ` Pedro Alves
2017-03-16 18:27       ` Wei-min Pan [this message]
2017-03-16 18:34         ` Pedro Alves
2017-03-16 19:10           ` Wei-min Pan
2017-03-16 19:21             ` Pedro Alves
2017-03-16 19:51               ` Wei-min Pan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=58CAD90A.40809@oracle.com \
    --to=weimin.pan@oracle.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox