From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id S3PfHh4EiWYTWh0AWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 06 Jul 2024 04:45:18 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=lwUWrIzN; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 6D5A91E0C3; Sat, 6 Jul 2024 04:45:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4730C1E097 for ; Sat, 6 Jul 2024 04:45:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6539C382BC3F for ; Sat, 6 Jul 2024 08:45:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-pg1-x529.google.com (mail-pg1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::529]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C84B3858C98 for ; Sat, 6 Jul 2024 08:44:55 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 4C84B3858C98 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 4C84B3858C98 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::529 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1720255497; cv=none; b=LvabUzi2BcQgEj/MzUn+LFLGTShTahA0gRw1t+bxvKjdgr6O9G3z4MwLYXej0Tk107gHkfj0ThTS66zIOpdyOVtt/dCIVKXDGq7sZsOAFCZ+yNkipgWCTEeGELE3D4AdVVL1F8/AtKGiXTq+ZS1uqwW6FQ1Gv/5zQeMcAnT7n4Q= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1720255497; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Twvz9PUCBZZG+X/FUtsEFxyHSwwjNL1j1E6GRzvUUSg=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=PYLuW729MJFiEpUxLjEhqlM8X02s6tqKNG1Hp0pzDtDk5Z72ti4EyRx7sCdDmMsq8HoZHjD8yBXLYGBy8LYfJS+Dk/ACwvt/6iLTToWbrrqcn9hMmFrRhb2z1nOwsXRvL3+ZKxQHPKY28fl3JXMKFaYU5JTZ31Blidya4ohnh3w= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: by mail-pg1-x529.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-6e7b121be30so1399991a12.1 for ; Sat, 06 Jul 2024 01:44:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1720255494; x=1720860294; darn=sourceware.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=TBzlzV3Kz8MXMG3FkdTlxX6yNkfVA6FdkmwFEwLPmnQ=; b=lwUWrIzN9BEwIOlXmPsE1C1K7NHW+jFD9G526ffR57c8UVjtATCBG49b9J8A9lJZXk jIf/3z0MY7MolgqbS+ofYvDPaq62Go0MHn+Unx+O7aYlEaZqKeUh0gUbS2AEkPOY0f8n yxLfXlGrlSmIMVls8+KKY0kIeQHt67pAB9eyQ5vhAKxRT7XXbRT749HmJ2LYfRswJt/8 oNaUJdtomaj7hfVKKXG6VQcNkJUZNUajfe4jll4o5vCCFKGq1pJLnp97Xh1zXbN3/Op/ 40MSqFc9P+clDSw7BUugSj6BxikYF+Y9qBEaEqC37/I1hhWeiTTSxWJTMmMLFB4qTkvw 0gxQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1720255494; x=1720860294; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TBzlzV3Kz8MXMG3FkdTlxX6yNkfVA6FdkmwFEwLPmnQ=; b=lN4oCjxgY6eMFikDKioYCBovqS8oMQCvb6m15g5n2AWVRdhDeaaRhtcbVwTQwyld6I coFBMBLEh7MEQwBseIuXuSGlJFQqsrftZ+B0ijkVkzKDFIJGt/PciQBNc0y+kwKPxU+a 6+Z2cuW6fevE0T7txGsqN5KF15dInilsCmEA3B0YmAdHL77ocgYLCItGVMwiHqrg/Al8 jZj2tjoQbBtQ5l+xamk6v7CkDLI6YJxBoVMim5tZssUT4SupR36WUEmTAByX06v2+jYq nc2PERgc31uxDzubhIoIuSZxLZKpTPOt/jHBaFxwuwUdX9ffCFeROD2mbLNdi9unX3tW 7ghg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YylmMWbQT1XmRarrratcjAxJLYwq/YWl5eOxX32MWGIbIkwh4gv myNHP0w80uNtHal5txHZLxZia1w1Ds77hNfAjC0kQ+cjC2ekqSnm+gYRdw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEwWqUHyQR+HtkCkDiBmUmWmyUxy5Z71eGRsbXaDs0j6+iO1XBN0P3WdMVi61T8oyHwKGBvAw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e5c8:b0:1f9:8f8d:cc8f with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1fb33e12b4cmr49981065ad.11.1720255494011; Sat, 06 Jul 2024 01:44:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from valdaarhun.localnet ([182.48.215.26]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-1fb3cb78fc8sm38882555ad.155.2024.07.06.01.44.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 06 Jul 2024 01:44:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Sahil To: Guinevere Larsen , Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, sahilcdq@proton.me Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gdb: fix "frame function" failure to get frame when call is it's last instruction Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2024 14:14:49 +0530 Message-ID: <5797530.DvuYhMxLoT@valdaarhun> In-Reply-To: <8634on7lgw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20240704163348.67304-1-sahilcdq@proton.me> <6436e55a-eedd-4c15-9ea1-693cf3680cee@redhat.com> <8634on7lgw.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Hi, On Friday, July 5, 2024 8:08:11=E2=80=AFPM GMT+5:30 Guinevere Larsen wrote: > [...] > If you have completed the copyright assignment process, yes that's > exactly it. If you haven't, you'll need that finished before being > allowed to push, since I think the changes to the testcase would be > considered legally significant. On Friday, July 5, 2024 11:46:47=E2=80=AFPM GMT+5:30 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 11:38:11 -0300 > > Cc: Sahil Siddiq , > >=20 > > "Eli Zaretskii (eliz@gnu.org)" > >=20 > > From: Guinevere Larsen > >=20 > > I'm not sure if you should start the assignment process yet, since the > > patch hasn't been approved. Eli (CC'd because of this question), should > > Sahil start the assignment process already, or wait for someone to > > approve their patch first? >=20 > Sahil can start the process regardless of the approval. The copyright > assignment is for this and all the future contributions, so even if > this one eventually doesn't go in, the assignment is good and valid > for future ones. Thank you for the clarifications. I'll start the process. Regards, Sahil