From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 106077 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2016 13:31:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 106068 invoked by uid 89); 22 Apr 2016 13:31:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=marks, Hx-languages-length:1406, wanting, spring X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 13:31:47 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5B6E85543; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 13:31:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u3MDVih0007157; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 09:31:45 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve maint print symbols,psymbols,msymbols To: Doug Evans , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, eliz@gnu.org References: From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <571A27C0.1070507@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 13:31:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-04/txt/msg00522.txt.bz2 On 04/20/2016 06:30 PM, Doug Evans wrote: > Hi. > > More old sandbox spring cleaning. > > At the time I needed this, I used it a lot. Thanks, I think this is quite useful and helpful. > I've since also added msymbol improvements if only for consistency sake. > It's helpful to have more control over what to print, > and to have the output appear on the screen > without having to go looking for it. Bleah. Yeah... No real comments on the patch itself. Only a small passer-by comment below. > + else if (strcmp (argv[i], "-source") == 0) > + { > + if (argv[i + 1] == NULL) > + error (_("Missing source file")); > + source_arg = argv[++i]; > + } > + else if (strcmp (argv[i], "-objfile") == 0) > + { > + if (argv[i + 1] == NULL) > + error (_("Missing objfile name")); > + objfile_arg = argv[++i]; > + } > + else if (argv[i][0] == '-') > + { > + /* Future proofing: Don't allow OUTFILE to begin with "-". */ > + error (_("Unknown option: %s"), argv[i]); > + } We don't do this often, but it's usual for tools to understand "--" as meaning end of "-" options. I'd instead do: else if (strcmp (argv[i], "--") == 0) { /* Explicit "--" marks end of options. */ break; } else if (argv[i][0] == '-') error (_("Unknown option: %s"), argv[i]); else break; So anyone wanting a filename that begins with "-" could still have it. Thanks, Pedro Alves