From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 83987 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2016 16:41:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 83970 invoked by uid 89); 21 Apr 2016 16:41:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:41:04 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA2A86406B; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:41:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u3LGf0iW005909; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 12:41:01 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Build GDB as a C++ program by default To: John Baldwin , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1461000466-31668-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <57164CA9.6080401@intel.com> <5717DED3.9020107@redhat.com> <4644337.bLejKkzcMH@ralph.baldwin.cx> Cc: Walfred Tedeschi , Simon Marchi From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <5719029C.3020306@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:41:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4644337.bLejKkzcMH@ralph.baldwin.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-04/txt/msg00502.txt.bz2 On 04/21/2016 02:42 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > If you are interested in fixing clang warnings I can submit some patches as > I tend to build gdb with clang on FreeBSD. It gets really unhappy about > unused functions from the VEC() generators which adds quite a bit of noise, I think that one was reported to clang before -- to make it stop complaining about unused functions defined in headers, and that they agreed that it was a clang bug. Maybe an option would be to disable the warning if compiling with clang. If it's not a too-ugly patch, maybe we could include it. > but some of the things it finds are actual bugs (though probably harmless > ones). Fixing actual bugs is always nice and welcome. [ Personally, I'd think it great if for each bug clang caught that gcc didn't, that a bug was filed against gcc. ] Thanks, Pedro Alves